Newsletter Subject

148 colleges and universities have policies substantially restricting freedom of speech

From

ballotpedia.org

Email Address

info@ballotpedia.org

Sent On

Tue, Aug 29, 2017 01:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

to the . Today, however, a number of . According to the , 148 colleges and universities “ma

[The Number Of The Day] Freedom of speech has been one of America’s core values since long before the nation won its independence, and it was enshrined in the very [First Amendment]( the [United States Constitution](. Today, however, a number of [colleges and universities are challenging the right to freedom of speech](. According to the [Foundation for Individual Rights in Education]( 148 colleges and universities “maintain severely restrictive, ‘red light’ speech codes that clearly and substantially prohibit constitutionally protected speech.” That figure represents 33% of the 446 institutions whose speech codes were reviewed by FIRE.[1]( Another 263 colleges and universities (59%) earned a Yellow Light rating. FIRE defines a “yellow light institution” as one that “maintains policies that could be interpreted to suppress protected speech or policies that, while clearly restricting freedom of speech, restrict only narrow categories of speech."[1]( Only 35 (8%) of the universities studied have policies that “do not seriously threaten campus expression.” FIRE gives these schools its highest rating: Green Light status. While the data shows a significant level of speech restriction, recent trends have shown a move in the direction of free speech. As recently as two years ago, 49% of schools had Red Light speech codes (down to 33% today). Also, eight schools have changed policies to earn Green Light status over the past year. That came on top of five other schools moving to free speech policies during the 2015 to 2016 school year. FIRE notes an important distinction between private and public colleges. Public schools are constitutionally required to allow free speech. Private universities, however, “possess their own right to free association, which allows them to prioritize other values above the right to free speech if they wish to do so.” If a private school chooses to restrict freedom of speech, FIRE encourages them to do so openly and disclose that fact to prospective students. While FIRE is critical of speech codes, proponents argue that these policies help foster more tolerant and respectful learning environments for students.[1]( For more information, see [FIRE’s Spotlight report]( check out the group's [ratings for individual schools](. Here are the results by state: [Image] [Click to view the Number of the Day online]( Each weekday, [Scott Rasmussen’s Number of the Day]( explores interesting and newsworthy topics at the intersection of culture, politics, and technology. Columns published on Ballotpedia reflect the views of the author. - [August 28, 2017 – 140,000 passengers per day will drive on new Tappan Zee Bridge]( - [August 25, 2017 – $17.7 billion spent on video games in U.S.]( - [August 24, 2017 – 19 percentage point gap between Pivot Counties and Democratic counties on gun issue]( - [August 23, 2017 – 116 references to God in state constitutions]( - [August 22, 2017 – 271 state legislators can’t run in 2018 due to term limits]( - To see other recent numbers, check out the [archive](.   Was this email forwarded to you? [Click here to subscribe to Scott Rasmussen’s Number of the Day.](   Scott Rasmussen is an editor-at-large for Ballotpedia, the Encyclopedia of American Politics. He is a senior fellow for the study of self-governance at the King’s College in New York. His most recent book, [Politics Has Failed: America Will Not]( was published by the Sutherland Institute in May.   Decide which emails you want from Ballotpedia. [Unsubscribe]( or [adjust your preferences→](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Google+](

Marketing emails from ballotpedia.org

View More
Sent On

18/07/2018

Sent On

17/07/2018

Sent On

25/05/2018

Sent On

25/05/2018

Sent On

24/05/2018

Sent On

24/05/2018

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.