Newsletter Subject

🤥 Have Your Keyword Tools Been LYING To You?

From

authorityhacker.com

Email Address

gael@authorityhacker.com

Sent On

Fri, Oct 1, 2021 05:14 PM

Email Preheader Text

TLDR: We’ve just released a new data study pitching all traffic estimate tools against each oth

TLDR: We’ve just released a new data study pitching all traffic estimate tools against each other, and one tool is clearly doing a better job. To know which one, [watch the video on Youtube](. If you’ve been following any of our pieces of training, you know we heavily rely on Ahrefs. We’ve done it for years, we’ve always liked it, but many of our students look at the price table and go like:  And it’s true, compared to the competition they’re more expensive. But if it helps you make better decisions with the hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars you invest in your sites, it’s probably worth it. However, if the info given is similar to cheaper competitors, why pay more? And that’s the question we set to answer in this week’s experiment. You can either keep reading this email to get the answer [or watch the video we made about it](. The Experiment We focused this test on the traffic estimates the tools give for a given page, as that’s how most of us do keyword research these days. Or should I say topic research?  And to evaluate how accurate these numbers are, we asked a bunch of our Authority Hacker Pro members (our advanced course) to share their analytics data with us so we can compare them with the numbers the tools give us. We subscribed to the following tools for this test: - Ahrefs - Serpstat - SEMRush - Surfer SEO - Ubersuggest - SimilarWeb After crunching the data and comparing hundreds of page’s actual analytics stats against the estimates these tools gave us, here’s what we found… The Results I’m not going to fluff this up. It’s not my style, but in terms of overall correlation, Ahrefs won, then they won even more after updating their estimates recently. And while their traffic estimates are pretty much always BELOW what the actual traffic is, their underestimation is consistent, which is a good thing when comparing sites to each other. By comparison, a tool like SEMRush was not that far in correlation but was either above or below by quite a margin, making the comparison between domains more difficult. And if you're a big crypto fan and want the same rollercoaster with your traffic estimates, we recommend you check SERPStat out because they often overestimated traffic by up to 25x. One tool that actually surprised us was Ubersuggest. It's much cheaper than all the other alternatives, and while it's not on the level of Ahrefs for traffic estimates, it definitely competes with the likes of SEMRush. This makes it a viable budget alternative to Ahrefs. Conclusion So let’s go back to our initial question: Is Ahrefs worth the money? Well, for traffic estimates at least, we think this data shows it is. The consistent underestimation makes a comparison between domains possible, which is much harder to do with ANY other tool because they overestimate or underestimate. However, if the fee they ask is something you can not cope with, the best alternative for traffic estimates is surprisingly Ubersuggest. At just $29 per month, it’s the Ahrefs lite Tim and his team (had to do it 🙈) refused to build. And it kind of sucks for us to come to this conclusion when neither Ahrefs nor Ubersuggest pays us any commissions 😬. But regardless of how much we make from our content, you know we’ll always come to you with the truth and not what makes us a pretty penny. So I hope this study was useful and shines some light on why we use Ahrefs for all our research and content. If you want more details on this comparison, check out Mark’s video by clicking on the thumbnail below [Or Read the Post With All The Stats]( Gael Breton Co-Founder of Authority Hacker P.S: I won't always make newsletters about what we cover on Youtube so your best bet to not miss any of these videos [is to subscribe by clicking here](. Sent to: {EMAIL} [Unsubscribe]( Authority Hacker, 20-22 Wenlock Road, London, N1 7GU, United Kingdom

Marketing emails from authorityhacker.com

View More
Sent On

21/06/2024

Sent On

20/06/2024

Sent On

17/06/2024

Sent On

14/06/2024

Sent On

13/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.