Newsletter Subject

How To Cure Brands’ Social Media Headache: Instagram And Snapchat Stories

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Wed, Dec 19, 2018 08:35 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. S

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Sponsor Message [iSpot.tv]( [TV Ad Measurement for Disruptive Brands]( []( [AdExchanger | On TV & Video] "[On TV and Video](" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. After this exclusive first look for subscribers, the story by AdExchanger’s Rae Paoletta will be published in full on AdExchanger.com on Thursday. Building Stories on Instagram and Snapchat is a Sisyphean effort for many marketers. After 24 hours, it all disappears. Brooklyn-based software company Mish Guru is trying to alleviate some of brands’ well-documented pain points with Stories. Its new Instagram Story Builder, which launched in November, helps gather user-generated content (UGC) tagged to a brand. It also allows advertisers to track engagement and traffic on Stories. McDonald's, Coca-Cola and PlayStation have all used Mish Guru’s other social tool, the Snapchat Story Builder, to incorporate UGC into their Stories strategies. User-generated content is very different from the highly polished videos abundant in Instagram or Facebook feeds, and for some advertisers, it might seem riskier or more challenging. But Mish Guru’s research found that UGC performs seven times better on Stories than highly produced videos. AdExchanger caught up with Mish Guru co-founder and CEO Thomas Harding to learn more about what brands can do to make their Stories work for them. AdExchanger: Why is it so hard for brands to build Stories on Instagram and Snapchat? THOMAS HARDING: First and foremost, it's a new format. If you look at where we've come from, we used to have the news feed, where you had a single post and people liked and shared and commented. So Stories is a totally new format that's mobile-first, full screen and fully immersive. I think people are just trying to get their heads around that change. Stories disappear after 24 hours. How does that complicate social strategy? Yeah, Stories are so content-hungry. What I mean by that is you could build something and then in 24 hours it's all gone. As a brand or as a publisher media company, you need to be constantly sourcing content, and it can be quite a challenge if you don't have enough dedicated resources for it. Is it hard for brands to gauge the effectiveness of Stories on Instagram or Snapchat? It's really hard to report against what you're doing as a brand right now [on Stories.] You can't really get good insight into what's working and what's not. We're of the opinion that the more data people have about what was previously done, the better off you're going to be in the future to help inform their strategies. What is Mish Guru doing to try and solve for this? We make it really easy to tap into a range of sources in order to populate Stories. We make it super easy to work with influencers, for example. If you're a video company, we can help you tap into the Stories that your team is creating on their personal accounts. Our platform makes it really easy to ingest all of that content. How does that work, given the abundance of video people create every day? Our platform makes it really easy to tap into a range of sources in order to populate a brand’s Stories. We make it super easy to work with influencers, for example. People are either streaming in video or tagging the brand on Snapchat and Instagram, and from our end, we're seeing that kind of user-generated content actually performing significantly better in terms of engagement. This is really killing two birds with one stone because it helps drop the cost of creating stories and the content itself performs better. So people don’t want content that looks produced? According to our database, we’re seeing about 35% higher completion rates on user-generated content. The main thing is that people want to see authentic video rather than overly polished stuff, and using your audience is actually a really quick and easy way to achieve that. The thing is, all this content is going to disappear after 24 hours. I think the expectation is to see video that looks a little more rough and ready because of that. People want to see something that looks like it was created for the platform rather than for the news feed. Can you give me an example of what this looks like with a client you’ve worked with? McDonald's had a fun campaign they ran recruiting people to work in their stores. They realized that their target demo is within the 13- to 24-year-old range, and the platforms they're using most are Snapchat and Instagram. They put out a really fun campaign using a Snapchat lens, which basically put the McDonald's uniform on you. They called it "Snapplications," so you could send in your job application. McDonald's used our platform to gather all the user-generated content created around the campaign. Then we moderated a bunch of the videos and republished all of the fun ones. People saw themselves popping up on the McDonald's Story, and it avalanched into a really big campaign for them and ultimately, I think, they won three or four awards for it. How did your platform help measure the success of the campaign? McDonald’s was looking at the engagement of the Stories. Using our platform, they were able to measure how many people were completing the Stories and how to optimize the content they were posting. They were also able to measure the traffic using our tool. There was a call to action posted [on the Stories] like, "Go visit this page," and using our platform, you could actually do the swipe-up link. We could then track the data to see how many people were swiping up on [the McDonald’s] content. I know [McDonald’s] had within the first day a couple thousand people who participated in the campaign and sent in applications, and they far exceeded what their goals were for recruitment as well. Follow Rae Paoletta ([@PAYOLETTER]() and AdExchanger ([@AdExchanger]() on Twitter. © 2018 AdExchanger.com | 41 E. 11th Street, Floor 11 | NYC | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. [Update your email preferences](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.