Newsletter Subject

OTT Providers: Beware When Expanding Service Internationally

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Fri, Nov 10, 2017 05:44 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. S

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Sponsor Message [FreeWheel Video Monetization Report: Q2 2017]( [Unrivaled Data to Fuel Your Monetization Strategy – Download Now]( [( [On TV & Video] "[On TV And Video](" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. Today’s column is written by Evelina Grines, vice president of media and entertainment at [MPP Global](. Video audiences in the US are soaring, growing 46.8% from August 2016 to 2017, per the [MPA](. And while that’s good news, viewership won’t rise like that forever, which makes it ever more important for streaming services to consider opportunities in other markets. Among the biggest challenges OTT providers face is how to scale globally, while considering new local sensibilities. This is as true for Netflix as it is for less globalized players. When expanding internationally, OTT providers must have multi-language capabilities. Lots of young people outside the US have grown up accustomed to subtitles, but this isn’t the case for their parents or older generations. Even the colors of subtitles can court sensitivity. Yellow, for instance, is often associated with informational programming in the Netherlands, France and other countries. Many European countries also have a rich dubbing sector, so providers must research what is available to them. Multi-language capabilities should also extend to customer support. Providers must ensure their support teams can speak the languages of the countries being entered. It can be as irritating to come across someone who speaks your language but isn’t from your country as it is to encounter someone who speaks only English and assumes you should, too. An approach that feels tailor-made goes a long way to engendering local trust. OTT providers must be sensitive to how people like to transact. For example, in Latin America, the average person doesn’t have a credit card, and in Germany, while most people do have credit cards, using cards for online payments is uncommon. OTT service in these markets that fail to account for these preferences will vastly limit the audiences they can capture. Additional consideration needs to be given to the demographics of a target audience within the country as well, as different age groups or population segments may have individual spending and consumption access and preferences. What business models will resonate in different markets? Is a new market oversaturated with subscription services? Is the content and value proposition compelling enough to compete for a subscription? Or is a pay-per-view, transactional approach more likely to work? Sony’s Crackle app is offered as an ad-supported video on-demand app in the US, but has launched subscription video-on-demand apps throughout Latin America. OTT providers must be flexible. Prioritize localized content. Everyone loves a hit US show, so they shouldn’t be discounted, but there’s a growing amount of equally well-produced storytelling coming out of local markets. Failing to consider them will lead to failure. OTT providers should also be mindful of taxation and other regulations that may make working in a new country difficult. In Brazil, taxation is almost impossibly difficult because businesses with a physical presence in the country are prioritized. In France, securing licensing for content can be complex because OTT providers may not have access to all episodes at once, or even in order. In short, providers can’t underestimate how complex international market expansion can be. They must keep an open mind and not simply replicate what they’ve done in their home markets. What worked for the United States won’t work for Argentina, even if residents in both markets are big fans of “Friends.” Follow MPP Global ([@mppglobal]() and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger](). --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor Message [FreeWheel Video Monetization Report: Q2 2017]( [Unrivaled Data to Fuel Your Monetization Strategy – Download Now]( [( © 2016 AdExchanger.com | 41 East 11th St., Floor 11 | New York City | NY | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. To make changes to your email preferences or to unsubscribe, please [click here](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.